← Teams

NWW-STC-Suver

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Anne Medzegian
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.27
Mindy Blakeslee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Betsy Hendry
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.83
Diane Tien
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.81
Lydia Oliger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Mindy Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Results14 ties
2025-03-16Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesEric Freeman / Anne Medzegian vs Mark Obrochta / Meghan Lewis6-3, 6-3
2025-03-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesEric Freeman / Anne Medzegian vs James Daniel Kohr II / Virginia Fung7-6, 6-4
2025-03-14Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesEric Freeman / Anne Medzegian vs Carlo Balmilero / Peggy Watanabe6-2, 6-0
2025-01-26Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesAnne Medzegian / Shannon Schuld-Gray vs Laura Steenstra / Shelby Rubin6-3, 6-3
2025-01-25Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAnne Medzegian / Shannon Schuld-Gray vs Ana Seelinger / Grace Yao6-3, 6-1
2025-01-24Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesShannon Schuld-Gray / Anne Medzegian vs April Hartstein / Amy Thompson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-11-18Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMindy Richardson / Brooke Cordova vs Michelle Leonatti / Karen Baebler6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLiz Suver / Betsy Hendry vs Terri Weintraub / Deborah Wilson1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-11-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMindy Blakeslee / Liz Suver vs Patricia Houghton / Kami Shaw6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMindy Richardson / Brooke Cordova vs Helen Omand / Pamela Kraus6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHuong Pham / Betsy Hendry vs Florence Stahura / Marie MacKey6-1, 6-1
2023-10-28Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesLiz Suver / Mindy Blakeslee vs Lolly Bates / Mary Ogborn6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiane Tien / Susan Lammers vs Gini Bouche / Racquel Johnson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-22Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesLydia Oliger / Betsy Hendry vs Judy Anders / Kasey Bower6-2, 6-3
2023-10-15Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMindy Blakeslee / Nancy Daly vs Karen Baebler / Ana Tessadro3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Mindy Richardson vs Terri Weintraub / Shino Hyde6-3, 6-1
2023-09-30Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDiane Tien / Lydia Oliger vs Sheri Bennett / Holly Yang6-3, 6-4
2023-09-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMindy Richardson / Susan Barker vs Yao Bailey / Julie Vanderburg6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Tien / Lydia Oliger vs Elizabeth Nott / Laurie Furumasu6-4, 6-1
2023-09-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHuong Pham / Diane Tien vs Junko Sarausad / Kyoko Imai7-5, 3-4
W#2 DoublesMindy Richardson / Betsy Hendry vs Camilla George / Kami Shaw6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Medzegian / Liz Suver vs Helen Omand / Florence Stahura6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Anne Medzegian
151W–91L career
0%97%3%
4.28
4.5
Mindy Blakeslee
80W–40L career
0%96%3%
4.27
4.5
Betsy Hendry
55W–35L career
1%98%0%
4.16
4.5
Diane Tien
50W–65L career
58%42%0%
3.83
4
Lydia Oliger
18W–28L career
2%93%5%
3.81
4
Mindy Richardson
110W–139L career
0%99%1%
3.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.