Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0M MALT Oberman

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-15vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0M MALT DeJarlaisLost 12
W#1 DoublesZachary Orlando / Jamie Mishich vs Austin Streeper / Terry Westrum6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJack Moldenhauer / Martin Mccluskey vs Daniel DeJarlais / Thomas Nicholas1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCharlie Oberman vs Dennis Hume5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-08vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0M MALT O'ConnellWon 20
W#1 DoublesZachary Orlando / Nishant Tilak vs Timothy Nott / David Bussan6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMartin Mccluskey / Jamie Mishich vs Jigar Patel / Eric Pomraning5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-07vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0M MALT DeJarlaisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Mishich / Jack Moldenhauer vs Austin Streeper / Alfred Sun6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNishant Tilak vs Thomas Nicholas6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCharlie Oberman / Alejandro Perez vs Alan Shepard / David Woldseth6-4, 6-1
2026-07-01vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0M MALT O'ConnellWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Mishich / Zachary Orlando vs Matthew Leikness / Dylan Oconnell6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNishant Tilak vs Jigar Patel6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLowell Cohen / Charlie Oberman vs Brad Stevens / Brian Kirkpatrick7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0M MALT DeJarlaisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Mishich / Nishant Tilak vs Arun Baxter / Seth Dailey7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharlie Oberman / Brian Katz vs Stephen Schaak / Alfred Sun3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMartin Mccluskey vs Dennis Hume6-2, 6-1
2026-05-27vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0M MALT O'ConnellWon 21
L#1 DoublesLowell Cohen / Martin Mccluskey vs Dylan Oconnell / David Bussan2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesZachary Orlando / Jamie Mishich vs Brian Kirkpatrick / Timothy Nott6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharlie Oberman / Brian Katz vs Brad Stevens / Eric Pomraning6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Nishant Tilak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.92
Jamie Mishich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Charlie Oberman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Martin Mccluskey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Brian Katz
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nishant Tilak
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Jamie Mishich
8W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Charlie Oberman
7W–13L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Martin Mccluskey
5W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Brian Katz
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.