Teams

LLYE-Yee/Jetton

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-06vs LCRI-Richards/CSDWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Davis / Anna Gay vs Pamela Beecher / Amanda Berry6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Yee / Lisa van Arnam vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-29vs LCRI-Richards/CSDLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnna Gay / Lisa van Arnam vs Pamela Beecher / Jamie Krueger1-6, 1-6
2024-09-26vs LCRI-Richards/CSDWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Davis / Anna Gay vs Anna Kamenova / Caroline Pickup6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-08vs LCRI-Richards/CSDSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDiane Dreffer / Dana Goodrich vs Jennifer Gardiner / Suzy Johnson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnna Gay / Lauren Hession vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Sarah Hoglund1-6, 2-6
2024-08-25vs LCRI-Richards/CSDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Dreffer / Dana Goodrich vs Pamela Beecher / Kristen Oliver6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesYin Chee Chin / Ana Endsjo vs Christine Richards / Caroline Pickup5-7, 0-6
2024-08-24vs LCRI-Richards/CSDLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnna Gay / Lisa van Arnam vs Jennifer Gardiner / Suzy Johnson4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Dana Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Anna Gay
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.25
Felicia Dean
published 4.5
4.22
Margaret Gilmore
published
4.15
Lori Woods
published
4.14
Irma Laney
published 4.5
3.99
Yin Chee Chin
published
3.79
Kirsten Morin
published
3.74
Lauren Hession
published
3.73
Lisa Yee
published
3.58
Ana Endsjo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Lisa van Arnam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Yee + Lisa van Arnam1440% games−10.2% vs expected
Dana Goodrich + Anna Gay4159% gamesnot enough data
Lisa van Arnam + Anna Gay033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Goodrich
91W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.33
4.5
Anna Gay
42W–52L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Felicia Dean
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
Margaret Gilmore
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
Lori Woods
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Irma Laney
42W–20L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
4.14
Yin Chee Chin
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
Kirsten Morin
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Lauren Hession
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Lisa Yee
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ana Endsjo
112W–98L career · 6 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Lisa van Arnam
102W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.