Teams

SDNC WE HT San Dieguito (9AM/12PM))/ Harnish

2025 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesLuis Rodrigo Grajales Alcantara / Emiliano Guzman vs Lorenzo Herrera / Tommy West3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Harnish / Tyler Werbel vs Brandon Lee / Christopher Penn7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTom Peterson / Richard Sanders vs Justin Cook / Eric Traboulay2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emiliano Guzman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.14
Aran Wong
published 4.5
4.01
Eric Harnish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.99
Tyler Werbel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Cole Urcelay
published 4
3.88
Teppei Karasawa
published 4
3.44
Eric Berryman
published 3.5
3.24
Richard Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Tom Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joshua Sarsfield
published
Luis Rodrigo Grajales Alcantara
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Vanderhyden
published
Randall Mar
published
Scott Malony
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Sanders + Tom Peterson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Emiliano Guzman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Aran Wong
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
4
Eric Harnish
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.01
Tyler Werbel
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Cole Urcelay
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Teppei Karasawa
64W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
3.5
Eric Berryman
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Richard Sanders
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Tom Peterson
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Joshua Sarsfield
14W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Rodrigo Grajales Alcantara
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peter Vanderhyden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randall Mar
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Malony
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.