Teams

PD18/Weinberg/PTC

2026 STA Adult Combo 18 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 10 7:00 PM
Palmetto Tennis Center
Sep 24 7:00 PM
Ebenezer Park
2026-08-20vs PD18/Wightman/EBELost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Weinberg / Julie Daniel vs Haley Wightman / Kameron Storr3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJackeline Bonilla / Amanda Lane vs Ophillia Dominique / Regie Genete4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Watkins / Kayla Johnson vs Melissa Boyer / Ronelle van Heerden6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Women - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD18/NANCE/FCC2051345
2PD18/Weinberg/PTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Amanda Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Julie Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Allison Patrick
published 3.5
2.98
Pamela Cody
published
2.92
Lyndy Graham
published
2.92
Catherine Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Jackeline Bonilla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Katarzyna Timmons
published
2.71
Jessica Weinberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Holly McCabe
published
2.45
Jenny Thigpen
published
2.44
Sharlyne Battle
published
Kayla Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Watkins + Allison Patrick3739% games−8.9% vs expected
Lyndy Graham + Allison Patrick134 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Watkins + Sharlyne Battle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Lane
33W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Julie Daniel
45W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Allison Patrick
24W–48L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.08
Pamela Cody
45W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Lyndy Graham
33W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3.5
Catherine Watkins
34W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
Jackeline Bonilla
52W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Katarzyna Timmons
27W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.82
Jessica Weinberg
23W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Holly McCabe
11W–8L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Jenny Thigpen
8W–26L career · no lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Sharlyne Battle
14W–18L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Kayla Johnson
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.