Teams

Plantation Petruccelli

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-01vs Sarasota/Dancer/40&Over4.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaureen Thomas / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Kelly Dancer / Amy Lyons6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaureen Rasp-Glose vs Cindy Fancher0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Kerry Distefano vs Sarah McNeill / Janet Sperling4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-22vs Sarasota/Dancer/40&Over4.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Pfister-Brown / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Kelly Dancer / Margaret Petersen2-6, 2-6
2025-02-15vs Sarasota/Dancer/40&Over4.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Deuitch / Beth Costa vs Elizabeth Green / Cindy Fancher7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKerry Distefano / Diane DeGurian vs Margaret Petersen / Marika Lindholm6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Pfister-Brown / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Kelly Dancer / Jennifer Peters6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-08vs Sarasota/Dancer/40&Over4.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesKerry Distefano / Lee Bailey vs Adriana Garcia / Jennifer Peters1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMaureen Rasp-Glose vs Janet Sperling3-6, 2-3
L#2 DoublesLynn Deuitch / Beth Costa vs Kathy McMahon / Amy Lyons7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnn Pfister-Brown / Heather Woodworth vs Desiree Lurf / Elizabeth Green1-6, 1-6
2025-02-01vs Sarasota/Dancer/40&Over4.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaureen Thomas / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Kelly Dancer / Kathy McMahon2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMaureen Rasp-Glose vs Desiree Lurf0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnn Pfister-Brown / Diane DeGurian vs Jennifer Peters / Jennifer Bright7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-01-25vs Sarasota/Dancer/40&Over4.5WLost 12
L#1 SinglesMaureen Rasp-Glose vs Desiree Lurf1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Petruccelli / Ann Pfister-Brown vs Elizabeth Green / Jennifer Peters2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaureen Thomas / Kerry Distefano vs Amy Lyons / Kate Thayer-Rhodes5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-18vs Sarasota/Dancer/40&Over4.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Petruccelli / Kerry Distefano vs Margaret Petersen / Marika Lindholm5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAna Areosa vs Cindy Fancher0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Pfister-Brown / Diane DeGurian vs Desiree Lurf / Elizabeth Green2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Diane DeGurian
published 4.5
4.21
Sally Alford
published
4.09
Beth Costa
published 4.5
4.09
Marjorie Petruccelli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.99
Ann Pfister-Brown
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.94
Mari-Ann Kucharek
published
3.90
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.83
Lynn Deuitch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Kerry Distefano
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Lee Bailey
published
Maureen Rasp-Glose
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Maureen Thomas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Pfister-Brown + Marjorie Petruccelli11651% games+9.7% vs expected
Marjorie Petruccelli + Diane DeGurian5455% games+6.4% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Lynn Deuitch8751% games+0.5% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Marjorie Petruccelli8555% games−1.8% vs expected
Maureen Rasp-Glose + Lynn Deuitch4352% gamesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Kerry Distefano1642% gamesnot enough data
Kerry Distefano + Marjorie Petruccelli224 matchesnot enough data
Beth Costa + Lynn Deuitch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane DeGurian
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.29
Sally Alford
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Beth Costa
26W–16L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.09
4.5
Marjorie Petruccelli
85W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Ann Pfister-Brown
110W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
Mari-Ann Kucharek
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Ana Areosa
141W–119L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Lynn Deuitch
137W–135L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Kerry Distefano
39W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lee Bailey
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Rasp-Glose
41W–52L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Thomas
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.