Teams

Q-Petersen/18/6.5/WCN/POTC

2023 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 6.5 Shrev

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Meg Frazier
published
3.61
Lindy Jackson
published
3.61
3.58
Wendy Chandler
published
3.46
Megan Stuermann
published
3.43
Leigh Flood
published
3.32
Stephanie Knox
published
3.30
Karen McCoy
published
Emily Cage
published 3.5
3.24
Karyn Triche
published
3.13
Carrie Rainey
published 3.5
3.06
Trisha Q-Petersen
published
2.94
Audrey Robinson
published 3.5
2.90
2.78
Amy Stafford
published 3
2.76
Kelly Silvio
published
Frances Dugan
published 3
Kristi Hight
published
Pam O'Brien
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karyn Triche + Meg Frazier17561% games+5.9% vs expected
Karen McCoy + Amy Stafford11455% games−4.1% vs expected
Stephanie Knox + Karyn Triche4157% games−4.3% vs expected
Audrey Robinson + Meg Frazier314 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Flood + Trisha Q-Petersen134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Silvio + Kristi Hight314 matchesnot enough data
Karyn Triche + Audrey Robinson303 matchesnot enough data
Karyn Triche + Megan Stuermann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Frazier
64W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Lindy Jackson
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Mary Catherine Kneip
19W–2L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Wendy Chandler
20W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.58
Megan Stuermann
39W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Leigh Flood
49W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Stephanie Knox
75W–33L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Karen McCoy
51W–36L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Emily Cage
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karyn Triche
47W–26L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Carrie Rainey
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Trisha Q-Petersen
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Audrey Robinson
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Concetta Chevallier
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Amy Stafford
27W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Kelly Silvio
28W–32L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Frances Dugan
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristi Hight
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam O'Brien
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.