Teams

Aceassins

Adult 40 and over · 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.70 / EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-15vs Tennis ZoneLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Hendershot / Rodrigo Ayabe vs Cesar Pernia / Julien Sauvagnargues2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesWaldemar Jablonski vs Andres Zirlinger1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJames Werder vs Matt Zaun6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-08vs Tennis ZoneLost 05
L#1 DoublesShannon Woods / Isidoros Skarlis vs Gabriel Raneses / John Bower3-6, 6-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Sacks vs Pat Baltz0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoel Garcia / Rodrigo Ayabe vs Theodore Butz / Todd Geiser4-6, 4-3
L#2 SinglesJames Werder vs Austin Hertzog1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Hendershot / Lakshminarayana Jampanaboyana vs Javier Avila / Kenn Waibel1-6, 4-6
2026-08-01vs Tennis ZoneLost 14
L#1 DoublesRobert Pitek / Michael Taylor vs Venkata Puvvadi / Indrajeet Joglekar2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWaldemar Jablonski vs Keith Hass3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTroy Tomlinson / Lakshminarayana Jampanaboyana vs Andres Zirlinger / Ben Waters2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJames Werder vs Louis Rivera6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesFabio Gomez / Joel Garcia vs Matt Zaun / Todd Geiser1-6, 3-6
2026-07-25vs Tennis ZoneLost 05
L#1 DoublesIsidoros Skarlis / Shannon Woods vs Austin Hertzog / Brett Siegfried4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJames Werder vs Keith Hass3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesScott DeNardo / Laszlo Szollas vs Gabriel Raneses / Pat Baltz6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Taylor vs Louis Rivera4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLakshminarayana Jampanaboyana / Rodrigo Ayabe vs Venkata Puvvadi / Kurt Althouse3-6, 2-6
2026-07-18vs Tennis ZoneLost 14
L#1 DoublesIsidoros Skarlis / Robert Pitek vs Cesar Pernia / John Bower3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesWaldemar Jablonski vs Ben Waters6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRodrigo Ayabe / Troy Tomlinson vs Julien Sauvagnargues / Theodore Butz3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesShannon Woods vs Brett Siegfried1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFabio Gomez / Joel Garcia vs Javier Avila / Kurt Althouse6-4, 3-5, 0-1
2026-07-11vs Tennis ZoneLost 05
L#1 DoublesRodrigo Ayabe / Bruce Hendershot vs Venkata Puvvadi / Indrajeet Joglekar1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLakshminarayana Jampanaboyana vs Austin Hertzog0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIsidoros Skarlis / Shannon Woods vs Matt Zaun / Gabriel Raneses5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJames Werder vs Pat Baltz1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFabio Gomez / Satinder Singh vs Kenn Waibel / Julien Sauvagnargues1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Zone052326145
2Aceassins0522346279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
James Werder
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.75
Waldemar Jablonski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.74
Scott DeNardo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Laszlo Szollas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Michael Sacks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.65
Isidoros Skarlis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Michael Taylor
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Robert Pitek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Shannon Woods
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.56
Lakshminarayana Jampanaboyana
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.55
Rodrigo Ayabe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.47
Satinder Singh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.41
Bruce Hendershot
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.40
Troy Tomlinson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.21
Fabio Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Woods + Isidoros Skarlis0543% games−1.7% vs expected
Rodrigo Ayabe + Bruce Hendershot1440% gamesnot enough data
Troy Tomlinson + Rodrigo Ayabe224 matchesnot enough data
Troy Tomlinson + Laszlo Szollas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Werder
25W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Waldemar Jablonski
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Scott DeNardo
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Laszlo Szollas
22W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Michael Sacks
36W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Isidoros Skarlis
58W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michael Taylor
17W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Robert Pitek
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Shannon Woods
15W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
Lakshminarayana Jampanaboyana
39W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Rodrigo Ayabe
115W–92L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Satinder Singh
27W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Bruce Hendershot
45W–119L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Troy Tomlinson
61W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Fabio Gomez
43W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.