Teams

Whittle-2.5-NE

2026 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 2.5 W

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-01vs Walley-2.5-PBWon 20
W#1 SinglesReika Sato vs Haley Walley6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJoy Whittle vs Sarah Sumrall6-1, 6-1
2026-03-01vs Thurman-2.5W-SWWon 30
W#1 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Adrienne Douglas6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJoy Whittle vs Katie Watson6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKayla Reynolds vs Ashlyn Gatlin6-1, 6-0
2026-02-28vs Gartman-2.5-GCWon 30
W#1 SinglesKayla Reynolds vs Robyn Johnson6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJoy Whittle vs Jennifer Mitchell6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesReika Sato vs Kelly Robinson6-0, 6-0
2026-02-28vs Bayati-2.5W-JXNLost 12
L#1 SinglesReika Sato vs Kari Thomas6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Kaiti Stewart6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJoy Whittle vs Cece Sherrod3-6, 2-6
2026-02-28vs DiSanti-2.5-GCWon 30
W#1 SinglesReika Sato vs Lauren Purvis6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Stephanie Chapman7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKayla Reynolds vs Stephenie Baker7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Ashton Scarborough
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Reika Sato
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.60
Kayla Reynolds
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Joy Whittle
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kayla Reynolds + Joy Whittle6357% games+15.3% vs expected
Joy Whittle + Reika Sato303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashton Scarborough
50W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Reika Sato
33W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.85
Kayla Reynolds
37W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Joy Whittle
36W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.