Teams

Raintree Raghavan Weekend Warriors

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Weekend Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-02vs Westwood Rabhan LadybugsWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Preservati / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Brian Rabhan / Jeremiah Brown0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-19vs TDC Orioles - ShermanWon 10
W#2 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Robert Preservati vs Dwight Galbraith / Scott Sorkin6-3, 6-4
2024-05-11vs CCV Murphy/Parker 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Robert Preservati vs Mark Murphy / Wit Robertson6-3, 6-3
2024-05-05vs Hermitage - SaduskyWon 10
W#3 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Joe Lacroix vs Mark Westman / John Martin6-3, 6-2
2024-04-28vs MRTC - FinnWon 10
W#2 DoublesRam Raghavan / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Steven Stinson / Jerome Brister6-3, 6-1
2024-04-07vs ACAC NedeffLost 01
L#2 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs Glenn Pfluger4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Weekend Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Lee Brooks
published
3.96
Tejas Raval
published
3.91
Eddie Parker
published
3.82
Henry Wood
published
3.82
ED Fuhr
published
3.80
Ram Raghavan
published
3.75
Bhargavaram Kallam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Matthew Sheehan
published
3.66
Seunghun Ok
published
3.62
Joe Lacroix
published
3.55
Matthew Lefkowitz
published
3.55
Vikash Sharma
published
3.34
Robert Preservati
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Parker + ED Fuhr5158% games−5.4% vs expected
Lee Brooks + Bhargavaram Kallam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Brooks
28W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
Tejas Raval
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.96
Eddie Parker
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
Henry Wood
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
ED Fuhr
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Ram Raghavan
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Bhargavaram Kallam
146W–87L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Matthew Sheehan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
Seunghun Ok
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Joe Lacroix
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Matthew Lefkowitz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Vikash Sharma
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Robert Preservati
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.