Teams

Falvey 18 4.5M Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 4.5 Mens Singles Mon

6 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-19vs Chapman 18+ 4.5M Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmiel Rossabi vs Polo Carrera0-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Chris Chapman6-3, 6-4
2025-07-14vs Houston 18 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesJohan Nordmark vs Michael Davis2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAmiel Rossabi vs Aadarsh Sivaprakash3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesConner McGowan vs Ako Barnes6-3, 6-0
2025-06-30vs Houston 18 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJames Kash vs Michael Davis0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesConner McGowan vs Ako Barnes2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAmiel Rossabi vs Wilson Paine1-6, 0-6
2025-06-23vs Cochran 18 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesConner McGowan vs Charles Calkins6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAmiel Rossabi vs Andy Rutledge3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Steven Denning1-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs Chapman 18+ 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Brian Cohen6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJohan Nordmark vs Chris Chapman4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAmiel Rossabi vs Edwin Maffiold2-6, 0-6
2025-06-02vs Cochran 18 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesConner McGowan vs Jeff Fusaiotti2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAmiel Rossabi vs Charles Calkins2-6, 4-6
2025-05-26vs Houston 18 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Tommy Houston2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmiel Rossabi vs Ako Barnes1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJames Kash vs Aadarsh Sivaprakash3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Mens Singles Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
TK Vacharee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.06
James Kash
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.00
Brad Falvey
published 4.5
3.98
Conner McGowan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.90
Johan Nordmark
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.70
Amiel Rossabi
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amiel Rossabi + Johan Nordmark314 matchesnot enough data
Brad Falvey + Conner McGowan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

TK Vacharee
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
James Kash
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Brad Falvey
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4.5
Conner McGowan
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
Johan Nordmark
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Amiel Rossabi
20W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.