Teams

GEPTA-8.0-MX-40(Boettjer)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · 2024 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Friedl/40&overMX/8.07219825247
2GEPTA-8.0-MX-40(Bezemek)(EPTC#1)63171023219
3GEPTA-8.0-MX-40(Boettjer)(FB)36101739275
4GEPTA-8.0-MX-40(Woo)(EPTC#3)2772045291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Holly Mata
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4.5
3.91
Andy Boettjer
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 4.5
David Quintanar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Cheryl Ledford
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.64
JENNIFER SIDA
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.38
Enrique Mata
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.37
Jammie Price
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jorge Chavez
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
Lia Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nicholas Roacho
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rocio Mora
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Rossana Roacho
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Timothy Vida
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rossana Roacho + Andy Boettjer6254% gamesnot enough data
David Quintanar + Timothy Vida033 matchesnot enough data
Rocio Mora + Holly Mata303 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Ledford + Jorge Chavez123 matchesnot enough data
Rossana Roacho + Nicholas Roacho123 matchesnot enough data
Jammie Price + Andy Boettjer123 matchesnot enough data
Enrique Mata + Holly Mata123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Holly Mata
67W–33L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Andy Boettjer
50W–63L career · 17 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.91
4
David Quintanar
32W–60L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Cheryl Ledford
37W–52L career · 11 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
JENNIFER SIDA
27W–17L career · 9 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Enrique Mata
58W–110L career · 32 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Jammie Price
47W–44L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jorge Chavez
65W–35L career · 25 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lia Shelton
144W–91L career · 28 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 29 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicholas Roacho
86W–61L career · 40 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rocio Mora
48W–26L career · 27 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rossana Roacho
118W–114L career · 36 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Vida
10W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.