Teams

Raintree Foster

2022 Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League · Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-20vs Kings Charter ThummaWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesErin Lyons / Linda Harrell vs Mary Spagnolo / Karen Davis6-4, 6-3
2022-06-06vs Bon Air FenstermacherWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesErin Lyons / Kathi Ford vs Greta Satterfield / Jennifer Brown6-0, 6-2
2022-05-16Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesMarcia Finsterwald / Erin Lyons vs Carolyn Martin / Carole Ramser1-6, 0-6
2022-05-09vs Twin Hickory Squad (Asthana)Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesMarina Plaksina-Vaniakin / Erin Lyons vs Kim Berselli / LIESEL GEIGER6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Working Women League 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Cam Nguyen
published 3.5
3.25
Shannon Foster
published
3.09
2.87
Eliza Causey
published 3
Elizabeth Pully
published 3
2.74
Kathi Ford
published
2.74
Erin Lyons
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathi Ford + Erin Lyons123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cam Nguyen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Marina Plaksina-Vaniakin
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Eliza Causey
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Elizabeth Pully
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathi Ford
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Erin Lyons
87W–117L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.