Teams

FD 9.0 PW Began

2024 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 9.0 Fusion Doubles

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · NEOTA 18&O 9.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 9.0 NC Wiles5113510110
2FD 9.0 PW Began339924188
3FD 9.0 CRC Katz1551329193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Andrew Triner
published 4.5
4.27
4.26
Alexander Hurtuk
published 4.5
Brian Rector
published 4.5
4.24
Jason Trapp
published
4.06
Allison Welch
published 4.5
4.04
Gabriela Heideman
published
3.91
Kim Hodgkiss-Lilly
published
3.89
Stephen Radachi
published
3.65
Tiffany Allison
published
3.50
Kate Began
published
3.42
Melissa Djohan
published
3.34
Nicole Mikolich
published
Molly Bauer
published
Rebecca Pope
published
Steve Kuri
published
Tyler Cole
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Welch + Tiffany Allison5158% games+12.3% vs expected
Allison Welch + Kate Began7161% games+5.1% vs expected
Melissa Djohan + Tiffany Allison314 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Mikolich + Kate Began303 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Mikolich + Tiffany Allison213 matchesnot enough data
Kate Began + Tiffany Allison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Triner
47W–37L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
Thomas Hodgkiss-Lilly
31W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Alexander Hurtuk
35W–22L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Brian Rector
102W–73L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jason Trapp
73W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Allison Welch
54W–36L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Gabriela Heideman
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
Kim Hodgkiss-Lilly
105W–58L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.91
Stephen Radachi
58W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
Tiffany Allison
52W–44L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.65
Kate Began
58W–38L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Melissa Djohan
27W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Nicole Mikolich
106W–87L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Molly Bauer
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Pope
21W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Kuri
13W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tyler Cole
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.