Teams

Sumner

2025 Adult 18 & Over-EC · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-04vs Hannon 2.5-Columbus-MTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Martin / Sarah Wooten vs Shelly Blaise / Chelsea Boulware6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChrista Winkler vs Lisa Minyard6-4, 6-2
2025-04-29vs Hannon 2.5-Columbus-MTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdriana Sumner / Mary Martin vs SUSANNE CUNNINGHAM / Skyler Stapp2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Wooten / Alison Buehler vs Lisa Minyard / Chelsea Boulware6-3, 6-1
2025-04-13vs Hannon 2.5-Columbus-MTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Buehler / Mim Boyette vs Skyler Stapp / Chelsea Boulware6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHiroko Clay vs Lisa Minyard6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChrista Winkler / Yunsun Park vs Mandy Hannon / Shelly Blaise7-6, 6-1
2025-04-07vs Hannon 2.5-Columbus-MTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Wooten / Yunsun Park vs Mandy Hannon / Skyler Stapp6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMim Boyette / Adriana Sumner vs SUSANNE CUNNINGHAM / Lisa Minyard7-5, 6-2
2025-03-24vs Hannon 2.5-Columbus-MTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Wooten / Hiroko Clay vs Mandy Hannon / Lisa Minyard7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlison Buehler / Christa Winkler vs Shelly Blaise / Skyler Stapp6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sumner50150270
2Hannon 2.5-Columbus-MTC0501530180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Hiroko Clay
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Sarah Wooten
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Christa Winkler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.25
Alison Buehler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.20
Adriana Sumner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.17
Mim Boyette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Yunsun Park
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Buehler + Christa Winkler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hiroko Clay
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Sarah Wooten
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Christa Winkler
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.45
2.5
Alison Buehler
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Adriana Sumner
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Mim Boyette
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.17
Yunsun Park
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.