Teams

Highgrove - Wall/Kenny

2025 SCTA Winter '24 · '25 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.90 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-08Lost 05
L#1 DoublesAmanda Kenny / Elizabeth Imperiale vs Roxanne Shoemaker / Susan Spradley6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristina Williams vs Daun Brown2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAutumn Cheely / Brooke Gammill vs Lesa Dugas / Beth Willingham4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Sams / Emily Wall vs Constance Ruddock / Tawana Stanphill2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLana Holt / Maureen McLaughlin vs Robin Johnson / Juliet Skonberg2-6, 2-6
2025-03-04Lost 14
L#1 DoublesMaureen McLaughlin / Ashley Sams vs Lisbeth Church / Roxanne Shoemaker1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Schriks vs Daun Brown3-6, 7-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Imperiale / Jaclyn McGurk vs Dee Blouin / Juliet Skonberg4-6, 6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrooke Gammill / Autumn Cheely vs Lesa Dugas / Susan Spradley2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesAmanda Kenny / Emily Wall vs Vicki Walker / Mary Beth Wyler7-6, 3-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for '25 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Autumn Cheely
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.09
Jaclyn McGurk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Brooke Gammill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
Ashley Sams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Kelli Bailey
published
2.87
Lana Holt
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Elizabeth Imperiale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Amanda Kenny
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Kristin Schriks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Maureen McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Emily Wall
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Michelle Rathburn
published
2.34
Christina Williams
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Kristen Gosdin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jolie Hardin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaclyn McGurk + Brooke Gammill2447% games+21.6% vs expected
Brooke Gammill + Autumn Cheely171951% games+8.9% vs expected
Ashley Sams + Kelli Bailey7356% games+6.8% vs expected
Jaclyn McGurk + Ashley Sams6649% games+0.5% vs expected
Amanda Kenny + Emily Wall2352% gamesnot enough data
Brooke Gammill + Lana Holt224 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Kenny + Kelli Bailey123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Imperiale + Lana Holt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Autumn Cheely
33W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Jaclyn McGurk
25W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Brooke Gammill
27W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Ashley Sams
33W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kelli Bailey
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lana Holt
15W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Elizabeth Imperiale
8W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Amanda Kenny
12W–19L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Kristin Schriks
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Maureen McLaughlin
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Emily Wall
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Michelle Rathburn
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Christina Williams
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Kristen Gosdin
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.29
Jolie Hardin
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.