← Teams

SAC-Gatzke

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Sydney Taggart
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
—
Deborah Puhl
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Bo Yu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.48
Molly Odonnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Timothea Barnatan
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.31
Lily Looi
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.19
Cathy Gatzke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-11-24Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Sydney Taggart vs Linda Graham / Shelly Perkins5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBo Yu / Lily Looi vs Kristen Fisher / Babette Zielinski6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Laura Rundle vs Launi Smith / Mary Hlady6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLaura Rundle / Sydney Taggart vs Carol Briggs / Robby Lafleur6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMolly Odonnell / Lily Looi vs Yuko Hopman / Dalika Crawford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Peterkort / Bo Yu vs Heike Droste / Rebecca Redding7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-10Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBo Yu / Laura Rundle vs Tonya Halog / Suzanne Boss6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Sydney Taggart vs Hideko Kershaw / Julie Hanson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Carol Peterkort vs Kathleen Murrin / Cheryl Roloff4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLaura Rundle / Sydney Taggart vs Margaret Sivertsen / Julie Hanson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLily Looi / Bo Yu vs Katherine Lomartire / Suzanne Boss6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Peterkort / Deborah Puhl vs Joanetta Testa / Kathleen Murrin6-1, 7-5
2024-10-27Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDeborah Puhl / Bo Yu vs Kana Wakamatsu / Tamara Witcosky6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLily Looi / Laura Rundle vs Carrie Fisher / Marie Picard6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Cathy Gatzke vs Kyoko Adcock / Erica Tsuruta6-3, 6-1
2024-10-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSydney Taggart / Timothea Barnatan vs Donna Feuerherdt / Linda Graham6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLily Looi / Molly Odonnell vs Teresa Jackson / Toni Kidd6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Puhl / Carol Peterkort vs Anita Havemann / Maggie Creps Weaver6-1, 7-5
2024-10-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMolly Odonnell / Laura Rundle vs Carol Briggs / Robby Lafleur6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Puhl / Cathy Gatzke vs Yuko Hopman / Mary Lowblad6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLily Looi / Timothea Barnatan vs Naomi Steinberg / Kristi Vargas6-3, 6-3
2024-10-05Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBo Yu / Deborah Puhl vs Sue Edmonds / Nenette Olson6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLily Looi / Laura Rundle vs RENEE VANDEGRIEND / Jeralyn Snellgrove6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMolly Odonnell / Timothea Barnatan vs Jenny Pizot / Kelley Gaylor6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sydney Taggart
68W–105L career
24%75%1%
4.02
4
Deborah Puhl
7W–4L career
not enough data
—
4
Bo Yu
105W–180L career
4%96%0%
3.65
4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
25%75%0%
3.53
4
Molly Odonnell
37W–90L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Timothea Barnatan
95W–117L career
0%98%2%
3.35
4
Lily Looi
77W–80L career
85%15%0%
3.31
3.5
Cathy Gatzke
53W–92L career
2%98%0%
3.19

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.