Teams

JStewart-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-11vs CKing-SVCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJasmine Hemmings / Athena Samaras vs Chrissy King / Elizabeth Arnold0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Rogowski vs Sarah Tuttle3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDonnetta Hanson / Yemi Runsewe vs Janna Hess / Amy Logue0-6, 3-6
2025-03-21vs MPruette-CCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJane Stewart / Sandy Rogowski vs Christine Tucker / Megan Pruette6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesEmani Eaglin / Grayson Barcinas vs Meg Smith / Nicole Helmke1-6, 6-7
2025-03-14vs EPatulski-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Stewart / Sandy Rogowski vs Kristi Brubaker / Sophia Ewing2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Corcoran / Yemi Runsewe vs Onyi Dillibe / Kelly Swisher3-6, 2-6
2025-03-07vs CFong-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonnetta Hanson / Feyisayomi Otegbade vs Catherine Fleming / Sybil Pye3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJane Stewart / Jasmine Hemmings vs Nav Grewal / Stephanie Lussier6-4, 6-1
2025-02-28vs APerry-HVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmani Eaglin / Yemi Runsewe vs Kylie Herst / Maria Behan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJane Stewart / Feyisayomi Otegbade vs Melaine Young / Kimberly Vandermeer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Susan Graff
published
2.72
Mary Corcoran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Grayson Barcinas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Athena Samaras
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.05
Yemi Runsewe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.01
Jasmine Hemmings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.01
Donnetta Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.93
Emani Eaglin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Feyisayomi Otegbade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sandy Rogowski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Graff
27W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Mary Corcoran
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Grayson Barcinas
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
2.5
Athena Samaras
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Yemi Runsewe
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Jasmine Hemmings
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Donnetta Hanson
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Emani Eaglin
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Feyisayomi Otegbade
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nakisha Boulware Watts
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Rogowski
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.