Teams

LTFC RED

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-14vs GAC GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Lash / Trish Casson vs Jeremy Erdley / Diana Pahnke6-0, 6-2
2023-05-07vs PRC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesRon Satha / Christine Paulsson vs Donna Chan / Jordan Rigberg4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-30vs KNO REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRon Satha / Christine Paulsson vs Grant Baesman / Elizabeth Baesman6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavid Lash / Trish Casson vs Tim Wilson / Kim Haverly1-6, 2-6
2023-04-23vs PRC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesRon Satha / Erin Clark vs Christine Heimbuck / Ian Dyer2-6, 5-7
2023-04-16vs WC YELLOWWon 10
W#3 DoublesRon Satha / Carol Wood vs Jamie Gagne / Michael Gagne6-3, 6-2
2023-04-09vs HG BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Michael Huynh vs Lisa Zook / Brian Zook3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-02vs SS-LT PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Lash / Trish Casson vs Amy Quinette / Ernest Duckworth7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Christine Paulsson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Michael Huynh
published
3.35
David Lash
published 3.5
3.28
Trish Casson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Ron Satha
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
John Randazzo
published
3.19
Audrey Moskowitz
published 3.5
3.15
Jennifer Ramsey
published
3.06
Erin Clark
published
2.88
Carol Wood
published 3
Nate Mariner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Paulsson + Ron Satha2344% gamesnot enough data
David Lash + Christine Paulsson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Paulsson
113W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Michael Huynh
44W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
David Lash
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Trish Casson
74W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ron Satha
102W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
John Randazzo
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Audrey Moskowitz
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jennifer Ramsey
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Erin Clark
36W–47L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Carol Wood
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Nate Mariner
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.