Teams

Southern: WTC: Harris/Shiro

2023 40&Over Mixed · 8.0 W

21 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-07vs TCH: (This is the) RemixLost 12
W#1 DoublesFiona Strachan / Tony Trinh vs Jeanna Lubozynski / Adam Wardell6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Konecke / Peter Bailey vs Laura Chilton / Steven Chiu1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKate Jennings / Marc Jennings vs Brad Dunn / Shannon van Loon7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-29vs Vista: Public Enemy #1Won 21
W#1 DoublesDarnell Caballes / Jennifer Naso vs Carlos Vasquez Sr / Stephanie Heitner6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Lam / Fiona Strachan vs Mitchell Low / Melissa Welch6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Dorais / Kaisa Elovaara vs Michael Boehme / Jane Kim4-6, 2-6
2023-04-23vs Premier AthleticWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Allan / Laura Emerson vs Richard Goods / Diana Kolev6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Lam / Erin Harris vs Aaron Boston / Melissa Boston6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRussvelt Vyas / Cintia Shiro vs Shinichi Arai / Natalie Woolwine7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDarnell Caballes / Sarah Konecke vs Brian Hogan / Jennifer Ryan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeike Martens / Tony Trinh vs Bobby Clarke / Maryann Cantone6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErin Harris / Kunal Maini vs Jiten Voralia / Ali Campbell0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-02vs WTC: Love ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDarnell Caballes / Sondra Lavin vs Lourdes Marti / Alfredo Marti6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCinthia Griot / Russvelt Vyas vs Maria Ayala / Juan Diez6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Bailey / Jennifer Naso vs Natalia Garcia / Manuel Rodriguez6-0, 6-1
2023-03-25vs MTDZ TennisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Brozek / Monica Ryan vs Paola Michel / Wulf Lueckerath4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCintia Shiro / Peter Lam vs Holly Collier / Patrick Penny Phiri4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Bailey / Sarah Konecke vs Lisa Dawson / Peter Clifford6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesTony Trinh / Laura Emerson vs Greg Martin / Mary Mondello6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKate Jennings / Marc Jennings vs Ray Hanna / Joan Sullivan6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRussvelt Vyas / Kaisa Elovaara vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-12vs NRRC: 8.0 Stirred, Not ShakenWon 21
L#1 DoublesDarnell Caballes / Sondra Lavin vs Hector Rodriguez / Salam Turki6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErin Harris / Peter Lam vs Helen Chun / Harald Collet6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHeike Martens / Matthew Allan vs Carol Myers / Robert Chun6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-04vs Chestnut Ridge: Match MakersWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Dorais / Cinthia Griot vs Mark Leeds / Kimberly Kraus6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCintia Shiro / Peter Lam vs Lisa Lubart / Adam Lubart7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Emerson / Kunal Maini vs Jessica Bremer / Marious Sjulsen6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 8.0 W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WTC: Love Shots0832041269
2Southern: WTC: Harris/Shiro0921616183
3Westchester Avenue Tennis - Terminetters 8.00919822195
4MTDZ Tennis0918925232
5Chestnut Ridge: Match Makers09151227234
6Vista: Public Enemy #109131330242
7Westchester Tennis Center:Trickster Mixer09121434258
8NRRC: 8.0 Stirred, Not Shaken09101637275
9TCH: (This is the) Remix09101739275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Jeffrey Brozek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Peter Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Fiona Strachan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Cintia Shiro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Laura Emerson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.09
Darnell Caballes
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.07
Heike Martens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.99
Peter Lam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Kate Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Erin Harris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Russvelt Vyas
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.77
Jennifer Naso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Cinthia Griot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Marc Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Sarah Konecke
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Sondra Lavin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Kaisa Elovaara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Brian Dorais
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Matthew Allan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Kunal Maini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Monica Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heike Martens + Matthew Allan5360% games+14.1% vs expected
Kunal Maini + Erin Harris11258% games+12.8% vs expected
Monica Ryan + Jeffrey Brozek291360% games+11.6% vs expected
Laura Emerson + Matthew Allan9555% games+4.0% vs expected
Cintia Shiro + Peter Lam10361% games+2.4% vs expected
Erin Harris + Peter Lam6158% games+1.7% vs expected
Cintia Shiro + Matthew Allan131448% games+1.2% vs expected
Cintia Shiro + Darnell Caballes4349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Brozek
95W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%85%14%
4.36
Peter Bailey
66W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Fiona Strachan
99W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Cintia Shiro
264W–196L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.15
Laura Emerson
177W–142L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Darnell Caballes
75W–67L career · 7 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Heike Martens
188W–129L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
Peter Lam
73W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.99
Kate Jennings
109W–113L career · 5 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Erin Harris
222W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Russvelt Vyas
110W–135L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Jennifer Naso
101W–44L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cinthia Griot
186W–124L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Marc Jennings
38W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Sarah Konecke
81W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Sondra Lavin
87W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
Kaisa Elovaara
121W–110L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Brian Dorais
137W–142L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.54
Matthew Allan
71W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Kunal Maini
178W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
Monica Ryan
68W–77L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.