Teams

NJ BLUE

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-11vs BP GREENSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKimberly Bonczynski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Harper / Michelle Halliday vs Kim Chen / Alexandra Wingert7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-27vs CP GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMiki Aylesworth / Angela Harper vs Elizabeth Bernadette / Cameron Passmore4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBeth McCarty / Michelle Halliday vs Kristin Loudis / Sissel Eckenhausen6-2, 7-5
2024-04-17vs BP GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberly Bonczynski / Megan Shibao vs Alexandra Wingert / Leslie Lane1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Halliday vs Deanna Ford Overdyke3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMiki Aylesworth / Angela Harper vs Christa Dobbs / Gabriela Flora6-1, 6-1
2024-04-13vs NJ GREENSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKimberly Bonczynski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMiki Aylesworth / Megan Shibao vs Emily Markwell / Lauren Rivas1-6, 3-6
2024-03-30vs CP GREENSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKimberly Bonczynski vs Cameron Passmore4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Halliday / Angela Harper vs Sissel Eckenhausen / Claudia Pillow6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Angela Harper
published 4
Beth McCarty
published 4
3.70
Kimberly Bonczynski
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Miki Aylesworth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Megan Shibao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Michelle Halliday
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.40
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Bonczynski + Megan Shibao3546% games+4.5% vs expected
Miki Aylesworth + Angela Harper3251% games−1.5% vs expected
Miki Aylesworth + Megan Shibao0739% games−6.3% vs expected
Kimberly Bonczynski + Miki Aylesworth123 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Bonczynski + Angela Harper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Harper
29W–31L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Beth McCarty
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Kimberly Bonczynski
98W–128L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Miki Aylesworth
84W–112L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.59
4
Megan Shibao
33W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Michelle Halliday
68W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Dayna Ashley-Oehm
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.