Teams

Net Ninjas

Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Central Mixed Doubles

23 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-18vs Lost-SolesWon 21
W#1 DoublesMukund Pai / JUHEE LEE vs Naoko Ikeda / Kevin Irani6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHarish Kumar / Kathy Tsang vs Jegan Podhanur / Risi Oseni6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSteve Woo / Melinda Lee vs Dennis Fernandes / Rosemary Sudol1-6, 1-6
2026-04-11vs Hot MixWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa Rim / Arvind Upadhyay vs Molly Mahn / Mansour Rismanchi7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVanessa Nied / David Bochner vs Karen James / Rudolf van Mol6-3, 6-4
2026-03-28vs Penn 1sSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMukund Pai / Michelle Kang vs Andrew Bowers / Shana Shah6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Bochner / Karen Shih vs Ray Anderson / Ivy Brown6-7, 6-7
2026-03-21vs M-TigersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMukund Pai / Teresa Rim vs Jiachang Gong / Wu Yang6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohann Lim / Alida Martorell vs Chih Chang / Andrea Chu3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPavel Baresh / Vanessa Nied vs Liyun Feng / Yun Shao6-2, 6-2
2026-03-20vs Mixed UpLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Cicerone / Harish Kumar vs Cecilia Orchard / Jon Rubinstein7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Kang / Arvind Upadhyay vs Jean Boyd / Lars Bohn3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Tsang / Todd Sherman vs Sue Pangis / Francois Fournier5-7, 4-6
2026-03-07vs Lost-SolesWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Rodriguez / Carlos Vasquez Sr vs Nischint Manelkar / Izabela Duda0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Bochner / Karen Shih vs Steven Kong / Rosemary Sudol4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVanessa Nied / Mukund Pai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-28vs Hot MixWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Liu / Teresa Rim vs Mansour Rismanchi / Allison Liss6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJUHEE LEE / Jim Serrano vs Chanaka Amarasinghe / Lan Luo4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSoo Kim / Carlos Vasquez Sr vs Ritch Belen / Tong Zhang6-2, 6-1
2026-02-21vs NJD/DjokersLost 12
L#1 DoublesHarish Kumar / Monica Rodriguez vs Mauricio Delgado / Shana Shah4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Sherman / Kathy Tsang vs Ray Anderson / Ivy Brown6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohann Lim / Melinda Lee vs David Cernava / Amy Campbell6-0, 7-5
2026-02-07vs M-TigersWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Bochner / Vanessa Nied vs Li Liu / Lixiong Gu6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Kang / Richard Liu vs Yun Shao / Andrea Chu3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Woo / Alida Martorell vs Aris Cheng / Yijun Lu6-4, 6-0
2026-01-31vs Mixed UpLost 12
L#1 DoublesPavel Baresh / Karen Shih vs Jon Rubinstein / Alison North1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarlos Vasquez Sr / Monica Rodriguez vs AUSTIN KIM / Elizabeth Rogers6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVanessa Nied / Arvind Upadhyay vs John Kudrle / Cecilia Orchard6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Central Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Alida Martorell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Carlos Vasquez Sr
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Todd Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Melinda Lee
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.01
Harish Kumar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Vanessa Nied
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.84
David Bochner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Michelle Kang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Pavel Baresh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Teresa Rim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Arvind Upadhyay
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Monica Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
JUHEE LEE
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Jim Serrano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Mukund Pai
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.58
Richard Liu
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Johann Lim
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.47
Kathy Tsang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.45
Sara Cicerone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Jigar Shah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Steve Woo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Soo Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Shih
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Woo + Teresa Rim19562% games+11.9% vs expected
Steve Woo + Alida Martorell11258% games+0.1% vs expected
Mukund Pai + Michelle Kang4645% games−0.6% vs expected
JUHEE LEE + Jim Serrano1544% games−7.9% vs expected
Vanessa Nied + Pavel Baresh3253% games−13.8% vs expected
David Bochner + Vanessa Nied5256% gamesnot enough data
Mukund Pai + JUHEE LEE3252% gamesnot enough data
Johann Lim + Kathy Tsang224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alida Martorell
104W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.43
4.5
Carlos Vasquez Sr
110W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Todd Sherman
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Melinda Lee
102W–43L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Harish Kumar
126W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Vanessa Nied
141W–49L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
David Bochner
20W–46L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Michelle Kang
179W–118L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Pavel Baresh
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Teresa Rim
114W–63L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Arvind Upadhyay
84W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.68
Monica Rodriguez
32W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
JUHEE LEE
151W–107L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Jim Serrano
61W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Mukund Pai
179W–130L career · 6 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.60
Richard Liu
110W–88L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Johann Lim
83W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Kathy Tsang
122W–81L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sara Cicerone
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jigar Shah
89W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
Steve Woo
70W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Soo Kim
119W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Karen Shih
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.