Teams

Ritch/HSV

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-27vs Bennett/Backus/LRLost 12
L#1 DoublesEdward Barbot / David Robinson vs Kevin Dugan / Paul Kroger1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Brown / John Bakalekos vs Dana Bennett / Floyd Lang4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMickey Robertson / Gary Cotter vs Tim Gunter / Pete Owens6-3, 6-1
2025-09-27vs Wallman/Bella VistaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Ritch / Peter Archbold vs John Zapp / Jim Denno3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBobby Ring / Chuck Brown vs David Zago / Steven Hebert5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDavid Robinson / Edward Barbot vs Eldred Fesler / William Hendrix6-1, 6-2
2025-09-26vs Crum/SpringdaleWon 21
W#1 DoublesGary Cotter / Mickey Robertson vs Val Robison / Herbert Crum6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMike Ritch / Peter Archbold vs Jon Adams / Stephen Adams6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDoug Williams / John Bakalekos vs Mike Horsman / Ricky Sutherlan3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Mickey Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Gary Cotter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Bobby Ring
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chuck Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Mike Ritch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
John Bakalekos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Edward Barbot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Archbold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Cotter + Mickey Robertson303 matchesnot enough data
Mike Ritch + Edward Barbot213 matchesnot enough data
Bobby Ring + John Bakalekos033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mickey Robertson
10W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Gary Cotter
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Bobby Ring
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Chuck Brown
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Ritch
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
John Bakalekos
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Edward Barbot
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Peter Archbold
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.