Teams

MHanauer-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-24vs SLlewellyn-DURWon 10
W#1 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Ryan Sayko6-2, 6-0
2026-06-17vs GDichter-CHTCWon 21
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Sravan Narayan4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJackson Cabell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAnil Chawla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-10vs JByrd-NCCUWon 21
W#1 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Simon Cagle6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Andre Tautjo3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesRaymond Xu vs Chandler Nguyen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-03vs SLlewellyn-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesRaymond Xu vs Kelvin Menezes6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Ryan Sayko2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-27vs GDichter-CHTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Noah Dichter7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHenry Stiepel vs Matthew Anderson0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-20vs JClough-DFCLost 02
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Eric Pollak4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesChristopher Green vs Edmund Malesky5-7, 1-6
2026-05-13vs JLundberg-DURLost 12
W#1 SinglesRaymond Xu vs Luc Sanchez6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHenry Stiepel vs Joshua Lundberg5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Al Pick2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Raymond Xu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
4.20
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Daniel Martchek
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 4.5
3.88
Henry Stiepel
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.87
Jackson Cabell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.73
Christopher Green
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anil Chawla + Jackson Cabell033 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Hanauer + Raymond Xu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Raymond Xu
21W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Daniel Martchek
111W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Henry Stiepel
13W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4.5
Jackson Cabell
44W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Christopher Green
24W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.