← Teams

Winter Winners - Heritage Bay - C. Witters

2021 Collier Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-16vs Treviso Bay - D. JonesLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesRachel Plisko / Cory Witters vs Dawn Jones / Lori Hyslip3-6, 3-6
2021-03-11Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCory Witters / Rachel Plisko vs Rachel Piacente / Shannon Drackett6-0, 6-1
2021-03-04vs Treviso Bay - D. JonesSplit 1–1
W#2 DoublesCory Witters / Barbara Horvath vs Susan Rafferty / Amy Showfety6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate Keillor / Roya Nouhi vs Linda Farrow / Susan Gruber6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-02-18vs Pelican Bay Park - PiacenteLost 0–2
L#2 DoublesKate Keillor / Maureen Rennie vs Marisa Fontana / Lynn Olson5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCory Witters / Barbara Horvath vs Lisa Lamorgese / Michelle Minor4-6, 3-6
2021-02-11Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesCory Witters / Liudmila Polonskaya vs Betsy Conte / Dawn Jones2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-02-04vs Pelican Bay Park - PiacenteWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesCory Witters / Barbara Horvath vs Kathryn Bullock / Alexandrina Covato6-1, 6-4
2021-01-21Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesCory Witters / Liudmila Polonskaya vs Dawn Jones / Gail Oroho1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-01-07Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesSonya Lee / Kate Keillor vs Alexandrina Covato / Alejandra Acuna6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Diane Janiec
published 3.5
3.16
Cory Witters
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Camille Vaccari
published 3.5
3.07
Maureen Rennie
published —
2.97
Rachel Plisko
published —
2.84
Barbara Horvath
published 3
2.77
Pamela Mitchell
published —
2.71
Kate Keillor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Sonya Lee
published —
2.51
Roya Nouhi
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Keillor + Cory Witters2–546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Janiec
34W–26L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Cory Witters
112W–125L career · 7 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Camille Vaccari
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.13
—
Maureen Rennie
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
—
Rachel Plisko
13W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Barbara Horvath
15W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
2.84
—
Pamela Mitchell
7W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kate Keillor
171W–148L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
—
Sonya Lee
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
2.54
—
Roya Nouhi
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.