Teams

JAndrade-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Wknd

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-15vs JLundberg-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Grant / Trung Tran vs Luc Sanchez / Joshua Lundberg1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlec Bergeron / Michael Young vs Raymond Xu / Laurence Isaacs7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJosh Jones / Dipen Vyas vs Jackson Cabell / Jeron Russell3-6, 5-7
2026-08-08vs ATiwari-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatrick Grant / Josh Jones vs Kyle Hudson / Neehath Malisetty6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAbraham Post / Trung Tran vs Elton TSAI / Devin Bhatt3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlec Bergeron / Michael Young vs Abhimanyu Joshi / Spencer Llewellyn3-6, 3-6
2026-08-01vs TCarroll.8.5C-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesJuan Andrade / Sergio De Figueiredo vs Mark Scherr / Jonathan Hodges2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Young / Evan Dorner vs Jim Riddick / Parv Mital1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDipen Vyas / Alec Bergeron vs Ryan Berliner / William Martin3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Wknd
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCarroll.8.5C-DUR2060132
2ATiwari-DUR12271493
3JAndrade-DUR031816105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Connor Wilkins
published 5
Evan Dorner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Patrick Grant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Alec Bergeron
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Sergio De Figueiredo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Josh Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Juan Andrade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Arun Manikumar
published 4
3.69
Abraham Post
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Trung Tran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Dipen Vyas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.06
Jay Wilkins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Connor Wilkins
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
4.5
Evan Dorner
9W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Grant
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Alec Bergeron
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.00
Sergio De Figueiredo
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96
Josh Jones
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Juan Andrade
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Arun Manikumar
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Abraham Post
49W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Trung Tran
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.47
4
Dipen Vyas
42W–140L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Jay Wilkins
15W–22L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.