Teams

11-SBrogden-Eno 6.5

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-03vs 8-SShukla-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdriana Doi / Jennifer Anderson vs Ashley McRae / Sabina Brookhart6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJaime Stein / Cecilia Edgar vs Amy Hobbs / Alecia Barnes5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-28vs 4-KMcWhorter-HVCC 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Clippinger / Adriana Doi vs Mary Susan Easterling / Rhiannon Ludington6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBracha Blanc / Danielle Boulanger vs Ruth Caccavale / Kim McWhorter3-6, 6-7
2023-09-26vs 5-LBaxter-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesTanya Barcinas / Bracha Blanc vs Kelly Jarrett / Mary Carter Taub2-6, 1-6
2023-09-19vs 6-MLong-Eno 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristy Avery / Bracha Blanc vs Megan Single / Beth Dingler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-24vs 1-CYu-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdriana Doi / Kathleen Guerra vs Megan Chiles / Shelly Guo6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Avery / Cecilia Edgar vs Eleanor Neilson / Jacqueline Yurkovich6-2, 6-1
2023-08-10vs 10-LCaldwell-SVCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTanya Barcinas / Jennifer Anderson vs Laura Caldwell / Stephanie Jabusch6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Martha Clippinger
published
3.41
Alison Kalinowski
published 3.5
3.27
Berna Tareen
published 3.5
Christy Avery
published 3.5
3.10
Tanya Barcinas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.92
Susan Brogden
published
2.92
Adriana Doi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Kathleen Guerra
published
2.71
Cecilia Edgar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Bracha Blanc
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Barcinas + Bracha Blanc1640% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Edgar + Bracha Blanc1643% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Clippinger
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Alison Kalinowski
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Berna Tareen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christy Avery
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Tanya Barcinas
205W–149L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Susan Brogden
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.92
3.5
Adriana Doi
38W–89L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.92
Kathleen Guerra
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cecilia Edgar
284W–255L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Bracha Blanc
291W–288L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.