Teams

Utah Valley-Orozco

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.29 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesJaimie Ribera vs Ashley Wright6-0, 6-3
2026-05-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesJaimie Ribera vs Karol Liced Sanchez Vanegas6-2, 6-1
2026-05-20vs Utah/Torres/18&Over/3.5WLost 02
L#1 SinglesGrace Neff vs Haley Swan1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBrianna Minnick vs Libby MacKay1-6, 3-6
2026-05-13vs SM-Harris & the Serve-IvorsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLynzee Jackson / Grace Neff vs Jennifer Evans / Stacia Carroll2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJaimie Ribera vs Yolanda Morris6-2
2026-05-04vs BaynaLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrianna Minnick / Lynzee Jackson vs Kalaiselvi Seetharaman / Katrina Mills3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesGrace Neff vs Sachiko Osterloh2-6, 3-6
2026-04-29vs Causing a RacquetLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrianna Minnick / Christa Orozco vs Jennifer Tooley / Jennifer Wecker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJaimie Ribera vs Grace Geer6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesGrace Neff vs Van Vo0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegumi Matsuzawa / Linda Orchard vs JaNean Nelson / Sabrina Walbrecht3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-15Won 10
W#2 SinglesGrace Neff vs Mary Vander Straten6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-08Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJaimie Ribera vs Karol Liced Sanchez Vanegas6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrianna Minnick / Lynzee Jackson vs Jane Woolley / Krissie Summerhays5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGrace Neff vs Lori Carter2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Carly Planck
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 3.5
3.40
Jaimie Ribera
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Alison Carlile
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Christa Orozco
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.15
Jenni Warner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Linda Orchard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Grace Neff
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.90
Liz Donaldson
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Cari Cardall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Brianna Minnick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.82
Chrissy Oliveros
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.74
Risa Karras
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Lynzee Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
2.45
Megumi Matsuzawa
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chrissy Oliveros + Liz Donaldson3448% games+7.2% vs expected
Liz Donaldson + Cari Cardall91445% games+2.5% vs expected
Chrissy Oliveros + Cari Cardall4744% games−1.4% vs expected
Risa Karras + Megumi Matsuzawa033 matchesnot enough data
Liz Donaldson + Alison Carlile213 matchesnot enough data
Christa Orozco + Alison Carlile123 matchesnot enough data
Christa Orozco + Grace Neff033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carly Planck
54W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Jaimie Ribera
13W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Alison Carlile
19W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Christa Orozco
27W–34L career · 14 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jenni Warner
61W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Linda Orchard
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Grace Neff
3W–13L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.00
3
Liz Donaldson
74W–89L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Cari Cardall
64W–91L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Brianna Minnick
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Chrissy Oliveros
77W–89L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Risa Karras
49W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Lynzee Jackson
2W–12L career · 11 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Megumi Matsuzawa
33W–52L career · 9 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.