Teams

BLindley (Firethorne)

2022 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-29vs CDewaele (Springfield)Won 10
W#2 SinglesTARA RAND vs Lindsay Luton6-4, 6-2
2022-07-22Won 20
W#2 SinglesDanielle Shealy vs Jessica Gentile6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJennifer Voci vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-15vs LBurks-Adams (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 SinglesSheri Newman vs Ursula Bonar6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesPatty Swan vs Amy Rottman3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-08vs CDewaele (Springfield)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTARA RAND vs CHRISTI DEWAELE6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Trena Thomas7-6, 6-4
2022-07-01Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPatty Swan vs Jessica Gentile7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-24vs LBurks-Adams (Life Time)Split 11
W#2 SinglesDanielle Shealy vs Kelli Arenson6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSheri Newman vs Kimi Parker4-6, 3-6
2022-06-17vs CDewaele (Springfield)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesPatty Swan vs Lindsay Luton4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesDanielle Shealy vs Kara Ward3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-10vs JButkovich (Life Time)Split 11
L#2 SinglesSheri Newman vs Karen Brown4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Deborah Smith-Shaw1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-03vs LBurks-Adams (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 SinglesTARA RAND vs Linda Burks-Adams6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Breck Lindley
published 3.5
2.98
TARA RAND
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.96
Sheri Newman
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Jennifer Voci
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.83
Danielle Shealy
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.81
Patty Swan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.75
Jennifer McCoy
published
Jennifer Challis
published
Shalini Patel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Shealy + TARA RAND5358% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Voci + TARA RAND5355% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Shealy + Jennifer Voci3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Breck Lindley
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3
TARA RAND
86W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Sheri Newman
71W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Jennifer Voci
96W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Danielle Shealy
91W–90L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Patty Swan
64W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Jennifer McCoy
26W–23L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Jennifer Challis
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shalini Patel
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.