Teams

WI Adult 55&O 7.0W (Day) GML FLAC Buzzard

2026 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W Day · 2026 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W (day)

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesDanielle Winchell / Stephanie Waddell vs Joyce Koker / Karen Papcke7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Freudenberg / Cindy Simonovich vs Theresa Leopold / Susan Schmidt5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Danielle Winchell vs Jill Polkow / Elizabeth Quigley1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Buzzard / Karen Freudenberg vs Julee Scherrer / Karen Papcke4-6
L#1 DoublesStephanie Waddell / Melissa Alexander vs Jill Polkow / Elizabeth Quigley2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Buzzard / Cindy Simonovich vs Sarah Evans / Kathy Kort7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Melissa Alexander vs Jill Polkow / Joyce Koker0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDanielle Winchell / Stephanie Waddell vs Elizabeth Quigley / Kathleen Streit3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Simonovich / Cathleen Nelson vs Kathy Kort / Theresa Leopold1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Danielle Winchell vs Julee Scherrer / Karen Papcke2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Simonovich / Susan Buzzard vs Joyce Koker / Jill Polkow1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W (day)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 55&O 7.0W (Day) GML FLAC Schmidt6015311121
2WI Adult 55&O 7.0W (Day) GML FLAC Buzzard0631532215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Susan Buzzard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Danielle Winchell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.04
Cindy Simonovich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Karelyn Hopkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Stephanie Waddell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karelyn Hopkins + Stephanie Waddell12260% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Buzzard
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Danielle Winchell
43W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cindy Simonovich
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
Karelyn Hopkins
291W–192L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Stephanie Waddell
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.