Teams

ATC - Pink Ponies - 65+ W 8.0

2026 65&Over Women · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesBrigitte Tanner / Kristen Woll vs Susan Silver Schlecker / Wanda Rettagliata2-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesRobin Aisenman / Laurie Leahy vs Heidi Seruya / Frances Milliken7-5, 2-4
W#1 DoublesBrigitte Tanner / Kristen Woll vs Heide Marie Bliss / Susan Silver Schlecker6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobin Aisenman / Laurie Leahy vs Robin Good / Wanda Rettagliata3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Hessekiel / Joan Veteska vs Mona Swanson / Deborah Antoine2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesLeslie Lombino / Robin Aisenman vs Bea Tully / Robin Good5-7, 4-4
W#2 DoublesAndrea Hessekiel / Brigitte Tanner vs Deborah Antoine / Frances Milliken6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJill Grayson / Laurie Leahy vs Wanda Rettagliata / Heidi Seruya3-6, 4-4
W#1 DoublesKristen Woll / Brigitte Tanner vs Susan Silver Schlecker / Pattison Youngren6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Lombino / Robin Aisenman vs Jan Wild / Mona Swanson4-6, 6-5
W#3 DoublesLaurie Leahy / Joan Veteska vs Heidi Seruya / Wanda Rettagliata6-4, 5-4
W#1 DoublesRobin Aisenman / Leslie Lombino vs Deborah Antoine / Heide Marie Bliss7-6, 4-4
L#2 DoublesMaria Sanchez / Fran Schwartz vs Wanda Rettagliata / Pattison Youngren2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMaria Sanchez / Fran Schwartz vs Heide Marie Bliss / Susan Silver Schlecker1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Woll / Leslie Lombino vs Deborah Antoine / Pattison Youngren4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoan Veteska / Robin Aisenman vs Mona Swanson / Jan Wild3-6, 2-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Robin Aisenman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Kristen Woll
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Brigitte Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Constance Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Fran Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Hessekiel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Laurie Leahy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Joan Veteska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Grayson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Lombino
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Maria Sanchez
published
Suzanne Schnitta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brigitte Tanner + Kristen Woll3243% games+2.1% vs expected
Robin Aisenman + Leslie Lombino3249% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Woll + Leslie Lombino1438% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Hessekiel + Brigitte Tanner224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Aisenman
21W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Kristen Woll
48W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Brigitte Tanner
124W–163L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Constance Hall
28W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Fran Schwartz
7W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Hessekiel
92W–104L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Laurie Leahy
53W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Joan Veteska
65W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jill Grayson
6W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Lombino
49W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Sanchez
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Schnitta
13W–32L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.