Teams

SFV Mixed Up

SFV-Mixed 18 & Over · SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-21vs SFV Paseo Crazy AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesAldo Angrisani / Paula Marbach vs Janine Baker / Edward Hatch6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatthew Barbor / Carrie Gasper vs Amanda Richardson / Mel Matibag4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-08-14vs SFV Herd ImmunityWon 20
W#1 DoublesMolly Jackson / MacLyn McRae vs Kathrina Cruz / Larry Hurwitz7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Barbor / Holly Metts vs Debi Conocenti / Philip Fox7-5, 7-5
L#1 DoublesMacLyn McRae / Molly Jackson vs Melvin Navarro / Teri Gustafson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Barbor / Holly Metts vs Naveed Irfani / Yvette Camacho3-6, 4-6
2021-07-24vs SFV Dream WeaversLost 01
L#3 DoublesAldo Angrisani / Holly Metts vs Kenny Puvogel / MISSY LOPEZ6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-07-18vs SFV Mixed NutsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Johnson / MacLyn McRae vs Veronica Garcia / Sunny Trinh4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAldo Angrisani / Caprina Auyong vs Deepak Antony / Melissa Fonteboa2-6, 6-7
2021-07-17vs SFV Pure DriveWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Duncan / Carrie Gasper vs DeAnna Crisp / Marcos Sevilla6-1, 6-1
2021-07-11vs SFV PVCC-Diverse Too!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Jackson / MacLyn McRae vs Lauren Hayden / Neil Patak6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Duncan / Carrie Gasper vs Christopher Camp / Teri Lorenzo6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCaprina Auyong / Matthew Barbor vs Ken Green / Michele Venegas2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
MacLyn McRae
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Aldo Angrisani
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Paula Marbach
published
3.27
Glen Chester
published 3.5
3.19
Mark Gasper
published
3.16
Carrie Gasper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Holly Metts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Caprina Auyong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
published
2.66
Molly Jackson
published
2.60
Pamela Bentley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
MacLyn McRae
94W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Aldo Angrisani
93W–87L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
Paula Marbach
18W–24L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Glen Chester
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Mark Gasper
4W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%7%93%
3.19
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 6 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Holly Metts
10W–19L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Caprina Auyong
86W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
2.66
Pamela Bentley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.