Teams

RIO DEL ORO 18AW3.5A-DT

2024 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Sara Pallas
published
3.89
Sarah Androvich
published
3.60
Jenn Bosley
published
3.56
3.53
Mary Kiefer
published
3.52
Heather Oakes
published
3.50
Connie Gutowsky
published 4
3.45
Julie Peabody
published
3.43
Cindy Toy
published 3.5
3.41
Raffaella Anderson
published
3.37
Kendra Johnson
published
3.28
Diane McLaughlin
published 3.5
3.19
Jaime Klinke
published
3.17
Carla Halligan
published 3.5
Lana Wong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenn Bosley + CHRISTINA ELLERMEYER11460% games+3.4% vs expected
Diane McLaughlin + Heather Oakes6453% games−1.8% vs expected
Carla Halligan + Raffaella Anderson123 matchesnot enough data
Carla Halligan + Heather Oakes213 matchesnot enough data
Diane McLaughlin + Mary Kiefer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Pallas
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
4.20
Sarah Androvich
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
Jenn Bosley
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
CHRISTINA ELLERMEYER
36W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Mary Kiefer
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Heather Oakes
23W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
4
Connie Gutowsky
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Julie Peabody
21W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Cindy Toy
23W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Raffaella Anderson
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kendra Johnson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Diane McLaughlin
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
Jaime Klinke
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carla Halligan
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Lana Wong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.