Teams

Scott/WattsLR/BP

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
3.81
Emy Roux
published
3.33
Robbie Rutherford
published
3.32
Jennifer Crow
published
3.13
Regina Maher
published
3.06
Haylee Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Brandi Watts
published 3
3.03
Emily Gates
published
2.77
Lydia Hunjan
published
2.68
Martha Wooten
published
2.68
Leah Welker
published
Jordan Ryals
published
Margaret Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Welker + Regina Maher4163% games+24.0% vs expected
Martha Wooten + Brandi Watts8554% games+5.4% vs expected
Emy Roux + Caraline Annichiarico3259% gamesnot enough data
Emily Gates + Haylee Scott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caraline Annichiarico
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.92
Emy Roux
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Robbie Rutherford
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Jennifer Crow
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Regina Maher
51W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Haylee Scott
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Brandi Watts
42W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Emily Gates
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Lydia Hunjan
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Martha Wooten
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.68
Leah Welker
29W–27L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Jordan Ryals
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Jackson
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.