Teams

EW-YTC-Stephen

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 MEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-19vs PC-KohanLost 13
L#1 DoublesRaymond Rust Jr / Thaddeus Stout vs Wayne Kohan / Ivan Guevara7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesOmar Fulton vs Jesus Bravo6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRick Vaughan / Guislain Lagron vs Morgan Neal / Chad Dawson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Fernandez / Dan Stephens vs Jay West / Don Donais7-5, 6-4
2024-05-19vs PC-Smash Brothers 2024Won 40
W#1 DoublesThaddeus Stout / Scott Stephen vs Young-Mo Kim / Joonhoon Kim7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarlos Pessoa vs Roman Gavino6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRaymond Rust Jr / Danny Anslinger vs Craig Hansen / Bart Munson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKarl Lieberknecht / Danny Sanchez vs Brian Cunnington / Hoewoon Kim6-3, 6-1
2024-05-18vs WCCP-OverservedSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRaymond Rust Jr / Danny Anslinger vs James Cramer / Zane Schafer6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesCarlos Pessoa vs Benjamin Gozart6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRick Vaughan / Guislain Lagron vs Kevin Collins / Pat Nevin6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKarl Lieberknecht / Danny Sanchez vs Bill Schoultz / Chester Richey7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-18vs PC-KohanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRaymond Rust Jr / Thaddeus Stout vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Ivan Guevara5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesOmar Fulton vs Wayne Kohan6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScott Stephen / Danny Anslinger vs Morgan Neal / Jesus Bravo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGuislain Lagron / Danny Sanchez vs Jay West / Randy Gable7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-17vs WCCP-OverservedWon 31
W#1 DoublesThaddeus Stout / Raymond Rust Jr vs Bill Schoultz / Pat Nevin6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesScott Stephen vs Kevin Collins6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesOmar Fulton / Rick Vaughan vs Bruno Caprez / Clinton Marvel6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKarl Lieberknecht / John Fernandez vs James Cramer / Zane Schafer3-6, 4-6
2024-05-17vs PC-Smash Brothers 2024Won 31
W#1 DoublesScott Stephen / Thaddeus Stout vs Young-Mo Kim / Joonhoon Kim7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCarlos Pessoa vs WOONGJO Choi1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesOmar Fulton / Rick Vaughan vs Roman Gavino / Sean Holloway6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Fernandez / Dan Stephens vs Craig Hansen / Bart Munson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-YTC-Stephen5115920206
2PC-Kohan42141024222
3PC-Smash Brothers 20240671737272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Rick Vaughan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Carlos Pessoa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Raymond Rust Jr
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Danny Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dan Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Danny Anslinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Aaron Matthias
published 3.5
3.19
Karl Lieberknecht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.17
Scott Stephen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Guislain Lagron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
John Fernandez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Omar Fulton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Thaddeus Stout
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danny Anslinger + Scott Stephen4454% games+4.6% vs expected
Rick Vaughan + Raymond Rust Jr3255% games+3.0% vs expected
Raymond Rust Jr + Aaron Matthias3251% games+1.1% vs expected
Danny Sanchez + Karl Lieberknecht2447% games−0.7% vs expected
Rick Vaughan + Guislain Lagron224 matchesnot enough data
John Fernandez + Danny Sanchez134 matchesnot enough data
Thaddeus Stout + Raymond Rust Jr224 matchesnot enough data
Scott Stephen + Thaddeus Stout303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rick Vaughan
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Carlos Pessoa
40W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Raymond Rust Jr
56W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Danny Sanchez
21W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Dan Stephens
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Danny Anslinger
46W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Aaron Matthias
22W–20L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Karl Lieberknecht
35W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.19
3.5
Scott Stephen
59W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
Guislain Lagron
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Fernandez
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Omar Fulton
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thaddeus Stout
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.