Teams

ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-25vs CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CW7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLethy Palomera / Amy Shehadey vs Kassy Chauhan / Kaitlin Drake1-6, 2-6
2025-10-05vs CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CW7.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesLethy Palomera / Sheryl Elliott vs Kaitlin Drake / Laura Burke1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPhuong Le / Sarah Vor vs Kassy Chauhan / Nicole Roberts1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJasmine Daza / Paola C Caraker vs Lisa Poore / Ana Cecilia Castillo6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-30vs CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CW7.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesPhuong Le / Paola C Caraker vs Kaitlin Drake / Stacey Munro2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJasmine Daza / Ilse Reyes vs Anne Ellis / Laura Burke3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBerlynn Schmidt / Sheryl Elliott vs Ana Cecilia Castillo / Emma Kalmbach1-6, 0-6
2025-09-23vs CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CW7.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesCassie Pearse / Amy Shehadey vs Kassy Chauhan / Nicole Roberts1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJasmine Daza / Ilse Reyes vs Stacey Munro / Raquel Medina4-6, 0-6
2025-09-21vs CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CW7.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Vor / Amy Shehadey vs Kassy Chauhan / Kira Wong1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJasmine Daza / Ilse Reyes vs Lisa Poore / Emma Kalmbach1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Clare Marie Castillo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Julia Castrejon
published
3.53
Sarah Vor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Paola C Caraker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Lethy Palomera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Ilse Reyes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Sheryl Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Amy Shehadey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clare Marie Castillo
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Julia Castrejon
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Sarah Vor
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Paola C Caraker
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Lethy Palomera
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.26
Ilse Reyes
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.25
Sheryl Elliott
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Amy Shehadey
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.