Teams

Williams/ Calhoun

2024 EVTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - Spring '24 · Ladies 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-28vs Ellington/DelllingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNellie Hibbard / Margie DeShon vs Linda Brunt / Michelle Arp6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-23vs EVTA/Lori ShookWon 10
W#2 DoublesNellie Hibbard / Margie DeShon vs Karen Putzer / Conilia Wade3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-21vs EVTA/Lori ShookLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Dobson / Kim Lamb vs Karen Putzer / Lisa Quinn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-07vs Ellington/DelllingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNellie Hibbard / Kim Lamb vs Tia Wilkes / Michelle Arp6-3, 6-3
2024-04-18vs Ellington/DelllingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargie DeShon / Kim Lamb vs Linda Brunt / Julie Lott6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Olivia Williams
published
3.53
Kim Lamb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Shirley Rutledge
published
3.46
Teresa Cain
published
3.12
Lauren MacKie
published
2.91
Carol Martinez
published 3
2.78
Debi Williams
published 3
2.76
Julie Graves
published
2.56
Ann Carroll
published 3
Margie DeShon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nellie Hibbard
published
Whitney Paradis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Lamb + Margie DeShon5258% gamesnot enough data
Carol Martinez + Debi Williams134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olivia Williams
29W–35L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Kim Lamb
215W–87L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Shirley Rutledge
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Teresa Cain
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
Lauren MacKie
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
3
Carol Martinez
35W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Debi Williams
22W–31L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Julie Graves
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.56
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nellie Hibbard
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Whitney Paradis
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.