Teams

Cochran/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 2.5 Women - Tuesday AM

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-29vs McClurg/Blivens/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesIrina Chapman / Patty Lohmeyer vs Lori McClurg / Melinda Norris-Munro4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAnna West vs Desiree Jones1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Jackson / Kristin Pratt vs Resha Blivens / Renee Taft0-6, 3-6
2025-04-22vs Forrest/Baird/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesIrina Chapman / Elisa Romans vs Madelyn Knowles / Ashley Hinesley6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAnna West vs Vanessa Bui5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPatty Lohmeyer / Kristin Pratt vs Kendra Birtsch / Camille Mitchell0-6, 1-6
2025-03-25vs Osborne/Reuter/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna West / Patty Lohmeyer vs Mckenzie Kleinhenz / Jennifer Drinnon0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLayla Cochran vs Hillary Murray6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Pratt / Leslie Jackson vs Jackie Osborne / Meredith Austin6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-24vs Atkins/Garrett/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Pratt / Leslie Jackson vs Dana Atkins / Caroline Royalty0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLayla Cochran vs Katie Medlin2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElisa Romans / Patty Lohmeyer vs Ashley Henderson / Meredith Garrett0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women - Tuesday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Patty Lohmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Irina Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Elisa Romans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Anna West
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.29
Layla Cochran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.26
Hannah Scott
published
1.88
Kristin Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Lohmeyer + Anna West2351% games+8.5% vs expected
Layla Cochran + Hannah Scott3443% games−4.7% vs expected
Patty Lohmeyer + Hannah Scott314 matchesnot enough data
Layla Cochran + Patty Lohmeyer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patty Lohmeyer
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Irina Chapman
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Elisa Romans
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Anna West
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Layla Cochran
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Hannah Scott
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Kristin Pratt
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.