Teams

Marsh Creek Greiner

2025 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Summer Weekend · 6.5 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-23vs FYC KaneLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Beatty / Ashley Samora vs Mary Kathleen Muldoon / Renee' Kirkland1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAllison White / Frances Greiner vs Ashley Helmick / Shields Hoida1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngie Webber / Andrea Kohn vs Lindsey Smith / Susan Vansandt6-7, 1-6
2025-07-26vs Duval/BulginLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Samora / Frances Greiner vs Meredith Hoffmann / Elizabeth Lovelace0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Adams / Terri Pereira vs Maggie Williams / Emily Painter0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Gianino / Irene Merenda vs Isabelle Milne / Suzanne Burhyte1-6, 3-6
2025-07-19vs Harbour Island BlunckWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Beatty / Alison Johnson vs Caroline Blunck / Julie Long6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEllen Adams / Frances Greiner vs Tonya Kern-Honea / Jolene Merritt1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaterina Jones / Andrea Kohn vs Eliza Ander / Hollis Washburn4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-12vs Williams Y TownsendLost 02
L#2 DoublesAshley Samora / Terri Pereira vs Traunia Senior / Cheryl Dickson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTricia Deal / Jennifer Akin vs Ann Garab / Heather Parrish3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Angie Webber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Andrea Kohn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ashley Samora
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Irene Merenda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Kate Beatty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Frances Greiner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Katerina Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Gianino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Pereira
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tricia Deal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Angie Webber
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Andrea Kohn
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ashley Samora
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Irene Merenda
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%16%84%
2.64
Kate Beatty
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
Frances Greiner
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katerina Jones
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Gianino
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Terri Pereira
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tricia Deal
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.