Teams

NETC:Alley Cats:Longbottom/Bobadilla

2024 EMA Tri Level Fall Women · 3.5W Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-21vs NETC:Smash Sisters:RogersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatia Nicole Bobadilla / Hailey Longbottom vs Monica Rogers / Joanne Grzembski6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKatia Nicole Bobadilla / Maureen Obrien vs Kerri Sullivan-Kreiss / Doreen Nichols6-1, 6-4
2024-10-06vs NETC:Smash Sisters:RogersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMickey Donahue / Hailey Longbottom vs Jessica Pendleton / Joanne Grzembski4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMickey Donahue / Maureen Obrien vs Kerri Sullivan-Kreiss / Joyce Zhou7-6, 1-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5W Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NETC:Alley Cats:Longbottom/Bobadilla4040230
2BBC:Brown Billone:Curran4242548
3LAK:Lakeville:Kelliher/Kimball4242555
4LFW:Wayland:Williams/Fordiani4242650
5SSY:South Shore:Baker3333760
6NETC:Smash Sisters:Rogers2222535
7WAC:Waltham:Lyu2222642
8WOB:Woburn:Bell2323644
9WOB:Lucky Strings :Maguire2323855
10KIG:KC 5K:Meyer15151064
11WESB:Westboro:Nichols/Sullivan-Kreiss0404844

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Hailey Longbottom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Maureen Obrien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Mickey Donahue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katia Nicole Bobadilla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katia Nicole Bobadilla + Hailey Longbottom5164% games+13.8% vs expected
Mickey Donahue + Hailey Longbottom5359% games+13.1% vs expected
Maureen Obrien + Hailey Longbottom10166% games+12.9% vs expected
Mickey Donahue + Maureen Obrien8164% games+1.4% vs expected
Mickey Donahue + Katia Nicole Bobadilla6846% games−5.8% vs expected
Katia Nicole Bobadilla + Maureen Obrien213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hailey Longbottom
54W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Maureen Obrien
83W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Mickey Donahue
97W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Katia Nicole Bobadilla
55W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.