Teams

WP BLUE

2021 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-07-19vs RHCC REDWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesCameran Jewell vs Taryn Petri6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-18vs SSHP GREENLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesCameran Jewell vs Ava Katubig6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2021-07-12Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesCameran Jewell / Emily Dietrick vs Kaitlin Williams / Mallory Burck6-1, 7-5
2021-06-07vs SSD REDLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesCameran Jewell vs Joanne Morando6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Emily Dietrick
published 4
3.17
3.00
Susanna Eckelberger
published
2.93
Cameran Jewell
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Kelly Harvey
published
2.71
Kate Harvey
published
2.70
Kalle Heckendorf
published
Katie Cook
published
Krissy Eckelberger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susanna Eckelberger + Kalle Heckendorf3347% games+2.5% vs expected
Kelly Harvey + Kate Harvey8848% games+1.7% vs expected
Kalle Heckendorf + Kelly Harvey14456% games−0.7% vs expected
Kalle Heckendorf + Kate Harvey2345% games−12.2% vs expected
Susanna Eckelberger + Kelly Harvey224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Harvey + Alexandria Farawell224 matchesnot enough data
Cameran Jewell + Susanna Eckelberger123 matchesnot enough data
Cameran Jewell + Kalle Heckendorf213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Dietrick
2W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
3
Alexandria Farawell
26W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%9%91%
3.17
Susanna Eckelberger
26W–21L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Cameran Jewell
56W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kelly Harvey
38W–29L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Kate Harvey
23W–35L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Kalle Heckendorf
27W–30L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Katie Cook
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Krissy Eckelberger
6W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.