Teams

ROSEBERRY

2024 Combo Doubles 40&Over-PB · Women 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.10 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-29vs Easterwood-Gilliland 8.5 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTracy Roseberry / Heath Ginn vs Stacey Hall / Melinda Robinson6-2, 0-5
L#2 DoublesAmy Batson / Cindy Cochran vs Allyson Easterwood / Laura Owen5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDanielle Black / Elizabeth Asmar vs Lisa Gilliland / Kim Tatum2-6, 1-6
2024-09-26vs Easterwood-Gilliland 8.5 40+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Batson / Cindy Cochran vs Hope Jordan / Jana Kay Boyd6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTracy Roseberry / Hope Andy vs Allyson Easterwood / Laura Owen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Olsson / Elizabeth Asmar vs Lisa Gilliland / Kimberly Fortenberry6-7, 4-6
2024-09-17vs Easterwood-Gilliland 8.5 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Olsson / Melanie C Fink vs Hope Jordan / Sabrina Schuerger6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Roseberry / Beverly Silman vs Delaina Lucus / Shaye Caldwell6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Batson / Karen Wilkins vs Stacey Hall / Melinda Robinson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-09vs Easterwood-Gilliland 8.5 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTracy Roseberry / Maya Stewart vs Lisa Gilliland / Kimberly Fortenberry1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Batson / Reagan Bryant vs Hope Jordan / Susan Shemper5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Silman / Danielle Black vs Delaina Lucus / Laura Owen0-6, 3-6
2024-08-18vs Easterwood-Gilliland 8.5 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Roseberry / Heath Ginn vs Allyson Easterwood / Sabrina Schuerger6-3, 5-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Batson / Danielle Black vs Delaina Lucus / Shaye Caldwell7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarrie Olsson / Keri Galey vs Susan Shemper / Jana Kay Boyd2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Batson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.68
Beverly Silman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Carrie Olsson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Melanie C Fink
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Keri Galey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Danielle Black
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Elizabeth Asmar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Cindy Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Tracy Roseberry
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Hope Andy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Maya Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Heath Ginn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Reagan Bryant
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Asmar + Danielle Black224 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Olsson + Elizabeth Asmar213 matchesnot enough data
Maya Stewart + Cindy Cochran033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Batson
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Beverly Silman
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Carrie Olsson
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
Melanie C Fink
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Keri Galey
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Danielle Black
40W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
Elizabeth Asmar
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
4
Cindy Cochran
9W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.34
Tracy Roseberry
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Hope Andy
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.29
Maya Stewart
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
Heath Ginn
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Reagan Bryant
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.