Teams

Chicks with Sticks

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-12-08vs Anything But NetLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Etherton / Sandy Horowitz vs Elizabeth Levy / Anabela Puhl0-6, 4-6
2023-12-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Beth Etherton / Angela Ferguson vs Dina Rachuba / Angie Norris6-1, 6-2
2023-11-13vs FuntennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Ferguson / Mary Beth Etherton vs Miyuki Sato / Mari Collins1-6, 0-6
2023-10-27vs Norbeck Blue BellesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Beth Etherton / Angela Ferguson vs Brooke Phillips / Christine Willey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Jody Amann
published
3.33
Nancy Cooper
published
3.26
Karoline Shannon
published
Caroline McLoughlin
published 3.5
3.25
Patricia Rose
published
3.18
Sandy Horowitz
published
3.12
Joanne Rome
published
3.11
Jayne Korolkoff
published
3.11
Mary Beth Etherton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Angela Ferguson
published 3.5
3.06
Karen King
published
3.05
Lisa Raker
published
2.98
Linda Wimsatt
published
Kristen Moshyedi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jayne Korolkoff + Joanne Rome123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jody Amann
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Nancy Cooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
Karoline Shannon
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Caroline McLoughlin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Rose
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Joanne Rome
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.12
Jayne Korolkoff
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Mary Beth Etherton
141W–140L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Angela Ferguson
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Karen King
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Lisa Raker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Linda Wimsatt
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Kristen Moshyedi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.