Teams

PD40/Jeffords-Brand/BYP

2026 STA Adult Combo 40 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs PD40/Pitiranggon/FTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Grant / Kellie Braddock vs Ning Wharton / Angela Lorenz2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGee Whetsel / Brandi Davis vs Ronelle van Heerden / Rashmi Anki6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharlene King / Robin Downing vs Laurin Gandy / Pat Pitiranggon0-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs PD40/L.Graham/PTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesShannon Jeffords / Brandi Davis vs Lyndy Graham / Mary Lynn Lee0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMarian Bunnell / Misty Lee vs Julie Daniel / Denise Weeks6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShelly Brand / Julie Strange vs Kay Zobrist / Pamela Cody5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-05vs PD40/Pitiranggon/FTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMisty Lee / Marian Bunnell vs Haley Wightman / ALISON THOMPSON6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Brown / Shelly Brand vs Ning Wharton / Helen Carroll6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKellie Braddock / Jeannie Gainey vs Tamera King / Ronelle van Heerden4-6, 4-6
2026-07-22vs PD40/L.Graham/PTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeannie Gainey / April Crawley vs Kay Zobrist / Pamela Cody4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTracie Cassidy / Brandi Davis vs Lyndy Graham / Mary Lynn Lee4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Jeffords / Misty Lee vs Katarzyna Timmons / Pamela Weinberg6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charlene King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jeannie Gainey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Shelly Brand
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Tracie Cassidy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Shannon Jeffords
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Gee Whetsel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Brandi Davis
published 3
2.82
Alicia Ross
published 3
2.80
Marian Bunnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Julie Strange
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Kellie Braddock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Misty Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
April Crawley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Robin Downing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Terrie Reames
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Grant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannie Gainey + Shelly Brand9260% games+9.8% vs expected
Shelly Brand + Gee Whetsel4354% games+7.7% vs expected
Jeannie Gainey + Kellie Braddock8852% games+3.3% vs expected
April Crawley + Julie Strange3550% gamesnot enough data
Jeannie Gainey + Gee Whetsel224 matchesnot enough data
Robin Downing + Misty Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Shelly Brand + Tracie Cassidy213 matchesnot enough data
Shelly Brand + Shannon Jeffords213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charlene King
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jeannie Gainey
24W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Shelly Brand
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Tracie Cassidy
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Shannon Jeffords
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Gee Whetsel
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Brandi Davis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Alicia Ross
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Marian Bunnell
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.80
Julie Strange
36W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Kellie Braddock
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.71
Misty Lee
31W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
3
April Crawley
16W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
43%56%<1%
2.52
Robin Downing
19W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Terrie Reames
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Shannon Grant
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.