Teams

MFulton-UNC

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-02vs MLong-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesLindsey Gouker vs Jonda Young6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMeghan Fulton vs Dora Gosselin4-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesMaggie Cao vs Sterling Ingui6-1, 6-3
2026-06-26vs DOrdronneau-TOCHLost 03
L#1 SinglesMaggie Cao vs Ann Laros4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSara Knechtel vs Liza Terll3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesVirginia Wang vs Angela Boone2-6, 3-6
2026-06-25vs SBartle-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesLaura Dean vs Shannon Bartle6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMeghan Fulton vs Susanne Schmal2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesVirginia Wang vs Valerie Williams6-4, 6-1
2026-06-11vs GLoFrese-TOCHLost 02
L#1 SinglesMeghan Fulton vs Leslie Jackson2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesVirginia Wang vs Becki Cleveland1-6, 0-6
2026-06-04vs CPeterson-HVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesLaura Dean vs Barbara Wilhelm1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSara Knechtel vs Cecily Peterson2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMaggie Cao vs Kelly Moore6-2, 6-1
2026-05-28vs MMacdonald-HSWon 21
L#1 SinglesSara Knechtel vs Shira Katsir6-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMeghan Fulton vs Tynita Edwards6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesVirginia Wang vs Linda Naden6-4, 7-6
2026-05-28vs CMurray-HRSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMaggie Cao vs CLARE MURRAY6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLindsey Gouker vs Michelle Koeneke6-7, 3-6
2026-05-15vs JRanheim-TOCHLost 12
L#1 SinglesLindsey Gouker vs Jamie Scaglione2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesVirginia Wang vs Edith Becerra3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMeghan Fulton vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-3, 6-1
2026-05-14vs LGilchrist-CHCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesLaura Dean vs Sarah Sapeta6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSara Knechtel vs Melissa Israel4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesVirginia Wang vs Laura Porter1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Laura Dean
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.82
Maggie Cao
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Lindsey Gouker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.70
Sara Knechtel
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.68
Meghan Fulton
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.27
Virginia Wang
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Dean
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Maggie Cao
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Lindsey Gouker
23W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Sara Knechtel
44W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Meghan Fulton
4W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Virginia Wang
10W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.