Teams

OLYMPIC 18AM3.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
3.61
John Cella
published
3.46
Pat Robertson
published
3.45
Thomas Byrne
published
3.36
Tom Yu
published
3.32
James Redfern
published
3.31
Tevis Martin
published
3.22
Thomas Boyce
published
3.20
Jon Dayton
published
3.18
Turner Uppgren
published
3.15
Ludwig Lin
published
3.07
Walt Willig
published
2.94
Seth Peckler
published
2.92
Elliott Robbins
published
2.83
Dennis Williams
published 3
Jamie Diamond
published
Marc Chaput
published
Stephen Wynne
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Skelton
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
John Cella
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
Pat Robertson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Thomas Byrne
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.45
Tom Yu
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
James Redfern
23W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Tevis Martin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Thomas Boyce
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Jon Dayton
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Turner Uppgren
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Ludwig Lin
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Walt Willig
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Seth Peckler
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
Elliott Robbins
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Dennis Williams
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Jamie Diamond
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marc Chaput
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Wynne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.