Teams

CSRC ANDERSON

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-09vs MEMPK THORNTONLost 02
L#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Marian Nelson vs Annette Markert / Julie Thornton4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLori McPherson / Cindy Hoit vs Shelly Schmidt / Vicki Gess3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-06-02vs CSRC MCCLENDONWon 30
W#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Martha Walker vs Allison Guinn / Deb Shipwash6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVincenta van Every / Alohalani Kaleo vs Carre Bistline / Diane Burton6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCindy Hoit / Lori McPherson vs Lou Ann McClendon / Sally Martin6-1, 6-3
2025-05-26vs CCOC SIMMONSWon 20
W#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Martha Walker vs Jane Ridings / Mary Simmons6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVincenta van Every / Alohalani Kaleo vs Allison Johnson / Carol Presicci6-2, 6-1
2025-05-17vs MEMPK THORNTONLost 01
L#1 DoublesMartha Walker / Eliza Montoya vs Julie Haynie / Sara Callender6-7, 3-6
2025-05-12vs CCW WARDWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlohalani Kaleo / Vincenta van Every vs Erin Contreras / Kele Hauke6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarian Nelson / Eliza Montoya vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-28vs CSRC MCCLENDONSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarian Nelson / Carrie Gilmore vs Diane Burton / Carol Young2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMartha Walker / Cindy Hoit vs Lou Ann McClendon / Allison Guinn1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Alohalani Kaleo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Vincenta van Every
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Lori McPherson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Eliza Montoya
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Carrie Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Jenny McCabe
published
2.77
Cindy Hoit
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Martha Walker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori McPherson + Cindy Hoit123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alohalani Kaleo
129W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Vincenta van Every
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Lori McPherson
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Eliza Montoya
51W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Carrie Gilmore
19W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jenny McCabe
1W–15L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Cindy Hoit
76W–82L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Martha Walker
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.