Teams

6-JMontague-CCC

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-25vs 5-JByrd-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesConor Kregecz / Walt Elder vs Alex Piasecki / PHI PHAM6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-18vs 3-CLynch-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Fu / Brent Fox vs Conor Lynch / John Chiles2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Mark Rhoades vs Gregory Downing / Kevin Winn3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesConor Kregecz / Brent Fox vs Liam McMahon / Noah Levine7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-04vs 7-KRamaswamy-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesConor Kregecz / Matthew Davies vs Abhimanyu Joshi / Shivam Panthri1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Mark Rhoades vs Anjaneya Tiwari / Monty Gaither4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-28vs 9-ZRowles-ENOWon 20
W#2 DoublesStephen Fu / Brent Fox vs Joseph Williamson / Tanner Dellinger6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Christopher LeGrand vs Keith Buckel / Owen Daly6-2, 6-2
2024-08-21vs 2-AYoung-EVWon 20
W#1 DoublesConor Kregecz / Travis Angle vs Robert Singagliese / Chris Reeves2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Richard Riedel vs Lee Goldberg / Valentin Verdier1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-14vs 4-CMoffitt-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesConor Kregecz / Travis Angle vs Grant Harvey / Josh Gouker6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Christopher LeGrand vs Sunny Chen / Jonathan Barnes4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Schumann
published 4
3.60
Conor Kregecz
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
published
3.33
Arash Chehrazi
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Stephen Fu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Robert Long
published
2.86
Matthew Davies
published
2.83
2.76
Travis Angle
published
Brent Fox
published 3
2.70
Mark Rhoades
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher LeGrand + Mark Rhoades224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Conor Kregecz
69W–28L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.60
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Stephen Fu
75W–129L career · 4 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Robert Long
13W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Matthew Davies
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Christopher LeGrand
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brent Fox
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Rhoades
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.