Teams

Cedars Island Girls

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 8.0 W Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-20vs LBK Public Serve-ivorsWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bright / Allison McCarthy vs Claudia Ellen Zimmerman / Sandra Duryea7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Tyson / Elizabeth Scheible vs Stephanie Almeida / Karen Kurgan6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bright / Allison McCarthy vs Jane Doe / Bernadette Waterman1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-27vs Esplanade HennessyLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia OConnell / Elizabeth Scheible vs Kerrie Kennedy / Shelley Finley7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-13vs Sarasota/Hagopian/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia OConnell / Elizabeth Scheible vs Karen Nicholson / Carol Frazier2-6, 4-6
2025-02-07vs Plantation DipierroLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Tyson / Elizabeth Scheible vs Diane DeGurian / Yvonne Walker3-6, 4-6
2025-01-30vs SSC DavyWon 10
W#3 DoublesAllison McCarthy / Jennifer Bright vs Marsha Timm / Sara Johnson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-16vs River Strand QuirosLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia OConnell / Elizabeth Scheible vs Annmarie Curle / Jenny Sherr4-6, 2-6
2025-01-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Scheible / Patricia OConnell vs Barbara Belanger / Deanna Allard3-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Jennifer Bright
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Lori Brochin
published
Alisa van Ryn
published 4
Brenda Baril
published 4
3.69
Jackie Dedrick
published
3.66
Elizabeth Scheible
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Shelley Fridley
published
3.23
Karen Adams
published
3.17
Allison McCarthy
published 3.5
Lisa Tyson
published
Vickie Miller
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Bright
100W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Lori Brochin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Alisa van Ryn
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Brenda Baril
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Dedrick
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Elizabeth Scheible
38W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Shelley Fridley
36W–86L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Karen Adams
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.23
3.5
Allison McCarthy
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Lisa Tyson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vickie Miller
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.