Teams

MLDST-Stamey/Caldwell PK 18 3.5 MX Tues

2025 Lake 18 & Over USTA Mixed Doubles · Mixed 3.5 Tues PM 18+

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-13vs MLJWO-Wolters/TRUMP MX 18+Split 11
W#1 DoublesDevon Stamey / Oliver Stamey vs Jennifer Wolters / William Wolters6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonica Fish / Chip McBride vs Mary Ellen Johnson / Michael Johnson2-6, 3-6
2025-07-30vs MLKSC-SCHER- Jana's MX 18+ 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMonica Fish / Chip McBride vs Jeff Reiner / Erin Lee3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesToan Nguyen / Lisa Bograd vs Beth Packard / Scott Hudson2-6, 3-6
2025-07-07vs MLJWO-Wolters/TRUMP MX 18+Split 11
L#1 DoublesDevon Stamey / Oliver Stamey vs Jeff Cooper / Dawn Aldrich4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChip McBride / Monica Fish vs Steve Lawson / Mary Ellen Herrmann6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-25vs MLKSC-SCHER- Jana's MX 18+ 3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Stamey / Nate McElwee vs Scott Hudson / Beth Packard6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMonica Fish / Chip McBride vs Ann Modlin / Hunter Noldin7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDevon Stamey / David Stamey vs Erin Lee / Jeff Reiner6-2, 6-4
2025-06-17vs MLDBA_Baker/NMP 18S 3.5 MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesChip McBride / Monica Fish vs Dave Dehn / Jennifer Saxton0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Stamey / Devon Stamey vs Dewey Baker / Sylvia Sullivan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-10vs MLEBO-Born/CSD Spartan ParkLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Stamey / Nate McElwee vs Caleb OBriant / Jessica Carilli4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesToan Nguyen / Lisa Bograd vs Carol Cousins / Aiden Orr3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDevon Stamey / David Stamey vs Victoria Peaire / Graham Wald2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.5 Tues PM 18+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Kelly Stamey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Devon Stamey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Lisa Bograd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Margaret Johnson
published
2.99
Monica Fish
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Toan Nguyen
published
Mindy Sells
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kelly Stamey
132W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Devon Stamey
73W–79L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Lisa Bograd
103W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Margaret Johnson
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Monica Fish
56W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Toan Nguyen
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Mindy Sells
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.